Gjest AnonymBruker Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #1 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 Teorien er ikke akkurat vantett, men alikavel litt skøy! Veit at alle ikke kjenner til dette systemet da men, men her er ei link til testen hvis noen er nyskjerrig: http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp http://cognitiveprocesses.com/index.html (info side om det hele) (kort fortalt går det ut på at alle har forskjellige personlighets funksjoner de bruker mest, f.eks åpen vs lukka, utadvendt vs inadvendt, faktarelatert vs drømmende og disse her sammen utgjør en slags personlighetstype) Hvilken personlighetstype er du?
Gjest Vitaminbjørn Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #2 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 67 introvert 1 sensing 25 thinking 33 percieving
Gjest AnonymBruker Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #3 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 Sånne tester trenger virkelig flere alternativer enn ja og nei.
Gjest AnonymBruker Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #4 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 Jeg tok testen nå, men forsto ikke så mye av svaret: You are: slightly expressed introvert slightly expressed intuitive personality moderately expressed feeling personality moderately expressed perceiving personality ????
Gjest AnonymBruker Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #5 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 Jeg tok testen nå, men forsto ikke så mye av svaret: You are: slightly expressed introvert slightly expressed intuitive personality moderately expressed feeling personality moderately expressed perceiving personality ???? Og Your Type is INFP Introverted 22, Intuitive 12, Feeling 50, Perceiving 33 Strength of the preferences % ???
Gjest Psiv Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #6 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 Her er den originale testen, den er litt mer utfyllende, og resultatet er litt lettere å forstå: http://similarminds.com/embj.html Og her er en utfyllende beskrivelse av alle personlighetstypene: http://www.personalitypage.com/ Jeg er en INFP, men grenser tett opptil INTP.
Hinata Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #8 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 (endret) 100 introvert 12 sensing 1 thinking 22 judging ISTJ Endret 8. juni 2010 av Hinata
Gjest Cipheria Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #9 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 (endret) Husker jeg leste om dette en gang i tiden. Ble ikke spennende før jeg leste om de kognitive funksjonene. Hjalp meg å forstå litt hvordan folk tenker. Selv om det ikke er en 100% treffsikker teori, så er det litt sant i det. INTP, btw. Endret 8. juni 2010 av Cipheria
Strenge Frk.Gerd Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #10 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 (endret) ENFP. Har også lest endel om dette og de ulike funksjonene. Ganske interressant Endret 8. juni 2010 av Strenge Frk.Gerd
Gjest AnonymBruker Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #11 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 På den mer utfyllende testen fikk jeg ISTJ - Introverted, Sensing, Thinking, Judgning. Vet ikke helt om jeg er med på at akkurat de ordene beskriver meg, men tekstene om personlighetstypen nedover siden passer svært godt.
Champagne Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #12 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 ESFJ E: 78 S: 12 F: 88 J: 89 You are: very expressed extravert slightly expressed sensing personality very expressed feeling personality very expressed judging personality
Gjest Micka Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #13 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 Hvilke kjente personer fikk dere opp, da? På min liste er Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Clara Barton (Founder of the American Red Cross), Ronald Reagan. Gøyal test.
Champagne Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #14 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 Jeg har judging veldig høyt.. er jeg en dømmende person ut fra denne testen??
Hinata Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #15 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 Jeg glemte å lese da jeg tok testen, men søkte på google og fikk opp Dronning Elisabeth II, Harry Truman, George Washington, George H W Bush, Herbert Hoover, Andrew Johnson, Benjamin Harrison og noen andre. Ei dronning og seks amerikanske presidenter må jo bety at jeg har en lysende fremtid (var for ISTJ)
Strenge Frk.Gerd Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #16 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 Jeg har judging veldig høyt.. er jeg en dømmende person ut fra denne testen?? Nei, det betyr ikke nødvendigvis at man er dømmende. Men det kan bety at man: I de rent ytre faktorene kan det komme til utrykk ved at man: Liker å ha det ryddig, komme tidsnok, holde orden, betale regninger i tide, ha generelt ryddig ytre liv. Eller at man f.eks liker forutsigbarhet fremfor uforutsigbarhet i en eller annen grad. Eller at man har god evne til å gjennomføre en plan eller et mål, og ikke bli distrahert av andre elementer like lett som de mer impulsive, åpne og spontane typene.
Champagne Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #17 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 Nei, det betyr ikke nødvendigvis at man er dømmende. Men det kan bety at man: I de rent ytre faktorene kan det komme til utrykk ved at man: Liker å ha det ryddig, komme tidsnok, holde orden, betale regninger i tide, ha generelt ryddig ytre liv. Eller at man f.eks liker forutsigbarhet fremfor uforutsigbarhet i en eller annen grad. Eller at man har god evne til å gjennomføre en plan eller et mål, og ikke bli distrahert av andre elementer like lett som de mer impulsive, åpne og spontane typene. Aha, det stemmer bedre
Gjest gjestdeluxe Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #18 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 (endret) Jeg fikk dette resultatet...tar det ikke altfor seriøst, men kikker jo på det! Jung Typology Test: Your Type is ENTJ: Extraverted Intuitive Thinking Judging You are: moderately expressed extravert - Slightly expressed intuitive personality - Slightly expressed thinking personality - Slightly expressed judging personality Of the four aspects of strategic analysis and definition it is marshaling or situational organizing role that reaches the highest development in the Fieldmarshal. As this kind of role is practiced some contingency organizing is necessary, so that the second suit of the Fieldmarshal's intellect is devising contingency plans. Structural and functional engineering, though practiced in some degree in the course of organizational operations, tend to be not nearly as well developed and are soon outstripped by the rapidly growing skills in organizing. But it must be said that any kind of strategic exercise tends to bring added strength to engineering as well as organizing skills. Hardly more than two percent of the total population, Fieldmarshals are bound to lead others, and from an early age they can be observed taking command of groups. In some cases, they simply find themselves in charge of groups, and are mystified as to how this happened. But the reason is that they have a strong natural urge to give structure and direction wherever they are - to harness people in the field and to direct them to achieve distant goals. They resemble Supervisors in their tendency to establish plans for a task, enterprise, or organization, but Fieldmarshals search more for policy and goals than for regulations and procedures. They cannot not build organizations, and cannot not push to implement their goals. When in charge of an organization, whether in the military, business, education, or government, Fieldmarshals more than any other type desire (and generally have the ability) to visualize where the organization is going, and they seem able to communicate that vision to others. Their organizational and coordinating skills tends to be highly developed, which means that they are likely to be good at systematizing, ordering priorities, generalizing, summarizing, at marshaling evidence, and at demonstrating their ideas. Their ability to organize, however, may be more highly developed than their ability to analyze, and the Fieldmarshal leader may need to turn to an Inventor or Architect to provide this kind of input. Fieldmarshals will usually rise to positions of responsibility and enjoy being executives. They are tireless in their devotion to their jobs and can easily block out other areas of life for the sake of their work. Superb administrators in any field - medicine, law, business, education, government, the military - Fieldmarshals organize their units into smooth-functioning systems, planning in advance, keeping both short-term and long-range objectives well in mind. For the Fieldmarshal, there must always be a goal-directed reason for doing anything, and people's feelings usually are not sufficient reason. They prefer decisions to be based on impersonal data, want to work from well thought-out plans, like to use engineered operations - and they expect others to follow suit. They are ever intent on reducing bureaucratic red tape, task redundancy, and aimless confusion in the workplace, and they are willing to dismiss employees who cannot get with the program and increase their efficiency. Although Fieldmarshals are tolerant of established procedures, they can and will abandon any procedure when it can be shown to be ineffective in accomplishing its goal. Fieldmarshals root out and reject ineffectiveness and inefficiency, and are impatient with repetition of error. Hillary Clinton, Napoleon, Margret Thatcher, Carl Sagan, Bill Gates, Golda Meir, Edward Teller, George Benard Shaw, and General George C. Marshall are examples of Rational Fieldmarshals. Ikke nok med det - utrolig hva man kan analyse generelt basert på de spørsmålene: Extraverted iNtuitive Thinking Judging by Joe Butt: "I don't care to sit by the window on an airplane. If I can't control it, why look?" ENTJs have a natural tendency to marshall and direct. This may be expressed with the charm and finesse of a world leader or with the insensitivity of a cult leader. The ENTJ requires little encouragement to make a plan. One ENTJ put it this way... "I make these little plans that really don't have any importance to anyone else, and then feel compelled to carry them out." While "compelled" may not describe ENTJs as a group, nevertheless the bent to plan creatively and to make those plans reality is a common theme for NJ types. ENTJs are often "larger than life" in describing their projects or proposals. This ability may be expressed as salesmanship, story-telling facility or stand-up comedy. In combination with the natural propensity for filibuster, our hero can make it very difficult for the customer to decline. TRADEMARK: -- "I'm really sorry you have to die." (I realize this is an overstatement. However, most Fs and other gentle souls usually chuckle knowingly at this description.) ENTJs are decisive. They see what needs to be done, and frequently assign roles to their fellows. Few other types can equal their ability to remain resolute in conflict, sending the valiant (and often leading the charge) into the mouth of hell. When challenged, the ENTJ may by reflex become argumentative. Alternatively (s)he may unleash an icy gaze that serves notice: the ENTJ is not one to be trifled with. Functional Analysis Extraverted Thinking "Unequivocating" expresses the resoluteness of the ENTJ's dominant function. Clarity of convictions endows these Thinkers with a knack for debate, or wanting knack, a penchant for argument. The light and heat generated by Thinking at the helm can be impressive; perhaps even overwhelming. Experience teaches many ENTJs that restraint may often be the better part of valor, lest one find oneself victorious but alone. Introverted intuition The auxiliary function explores the blueprints of archetypal patterns and equips Thinking with a fresh, dynamic sense of how things work. Improvising on the fly is something many ENTJs do very well. As Thinking's subordinate, insights are of value only insofar as they further the Right, True Cause celebre. [n.b.: ENTJs are capable of living on a higher plane, if you will, and learning to value individuals even above their principles. The above dynamic suggests less individuation.] Extraverted Sensing Sensing reaches out to embrace that which physically touches it. ENTJs have an awareness of the real; of that which exists. By stilling the engines of Thinking and intuition, this type may experience the Here and Now, and know things not dreamt of nor even postulated in iNtuition's philosophy. Sensing's minor role, however, puts it at risk for distortion or extreme weakness beneath the hustle and bustle of the giants N and T. Introverted Feeling Feeling is romantic, as the ethereal as the inner world from whence it doth emerge. When it be awake, feeling evokes great passion that knows not nuance of proportion nor context. Perhaps these lesser functions inspire glorious recreational quests in worlds that never were, or may only ever be in fantasy. When overdone or taken too seriously, Fi turned outward often becomes maudlin or melodramatic. Feeling in this type appears most authentic when implied or expressed covertly in a firm handshake, accepting demeanor, or act of sacrifice thinly covered by excuses of lack of any personal interest in the relinquished item. Famous ENTJs: U.S. Presidents: Franklin D. Roosevelt Richard M. Nixon Lamar Alexander (US Senator) Les Aspen, former U.S. Secretary of Defense Candace Bergen (Murphy Brown) Jim Carrey (Ace Ventura: Pet Detective, The Mask) Rahm Emanuel, White House Chief of Staff Harrison Ford Newt Gingrich Whoopi Goldberg Benny Goodman, "Big Band" leader Al Gore (U.S Vice President, 1993-2001) Penn Jillette Steve Jobs Dave Letterman Steve Martin General Norman Schwarzkopf Patrick Stewart (STNG: Jean Luc Picard) Margaret Thatcher Robert James Waller (author: The Bridges of Madison County) Sigourney Weaver Endret 8. juni 2010 av gjestdeluxe
Kattugla Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #19 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 ISFJ introvert 78 sensing 12 feeling 38 judging 22 # very expressed introvert # slightly expressed sensing personality # moderately expressed feeling personality # slightly expressed judging personality
frøken_øst Skrevet 8. juni 2010 #20 Skrevet 8. juni 2010 ISFJ Hvordam fant dere ut det med kjente personer?
Fremhevede innlegg
Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere
Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar
Opprett konto
Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!
Opprett en kontoLogg inn
Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.
Logg inn nå